Produits phares
ETAP est Vérifié et Validé (V&V) par rapport aux résultats sur le terrain, aux mesures réelles du système, aux programmes établis et aux calculs manuels afin d'assurer son exactitude technique.
Chaque version d'ETAP est soumise à un processus complet V&V utilisant des centaines de cas de tests pour chaque module de calcul.
Les cas de tests suivants fournissent un exemple du type de tests effectués pour chaque analyse. Notez que tous ces cas indiquent une corrélation très étroite entre les résultats simulés ETAP et les mesures sur le terrain ou d'autres programmes.
Case No. 1Comparison of ETAP Load Flow Results Against a Published Textbook ExampleThis document provides a comparison of ETAP Load Flow results against published results in "Power System Control and Stability” by P. Anderson and A. Fouad.
Case No. 2Comparison of ETAP Load Flow Results Against a Published ExampleThis document provides a comparison of ETAP Load Flow results against published results in “Computer Aided Power System Operation and Analysis” by R.N Dhar.Case No. 3Comparison of ETAP Load Flow Results Against a Published Textbook ExampleThis document provides a comparison of ETAP Load Flow results against published results in IEEE Standard 399-1997 “Recommended Practice for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Analysis”.Case No. 4Comparison of ETAP Load Flow Results Against a Published Textbook ExampleThis document provides a comparison of ETAP Load Flow results against published results in IEEE Standard 3002.2-2008 “IEEE Recommended Practice for Conducting Load-Flow Studies and Analysis of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems”.
Case No. 1Comparison of ETAP Motor Starting with Torque Control Against Hand Calculated ResultsThe ETAP V&V process for the Motor Starting program has over 1600 test case scenarios that are run before each ETAP release. The following cases are excerpts from the Motor Starting V&V documentation.
Case No. 2Comparison of ETAP Motor Starting Results Against Transient StabilityComparison of ETAP Motor acceleration (MS) results against ETAP Transient Stability (TS) results which were validated against field measurements and hand calculations.
Case No. 1Comparison of Short-Circuit Results against Hand Calculations based on Application Engineering InformationComparison of ETAP 3-phase Short-Circuit results against published results in “Short-Circuit Current Calculations for Industrial and Commercial Power Systems” published by General Electric.Case No. 2Comparison of ETAP Unbalanced Short-Circuit results against Published valuesComparison of ETAP unbalanced fault results against published results in “Faulted Power System Analysis” by Paul Anderson, 1973, page 38-40.
Case No. 3Comparison of ETAP 3-Phase Duty Short-Circuit Calculations against Published IEEE Std 399-1997 ExampleComparison of ETAP 3-phase Duty Short-circuit results against a published 44-bus example from the IEEE Std. 399-1997, Section 7.7, pages 187-205.
Case No. 1Comparison of ETAP Short-Circuit IEC Calculations against Published ExampleThe ETAP V&V process for the IEC Short-Circuit program has over 1100 test case scenarios that are run before each ETAP release. The following cases are excerpts from the Short-Circuit IEC 3-phase and unbalanced short circuit results
Case No. 2Comparison of ETAP Short-Circuit IEC Calculations against Published ExampleThis document provides an ETAP validation case. This is just one of many test case scenarios for IEC Short Circuit (SCIEC) which are part of ETAP V&V program. This case is a validation case based on comparisons against published results in the IEC TR 60909-4:2021 document for Short-Circuit analysis.
Assurance Qualité ETAP | (949) 900-1000 | qa@etap.com